Solar Power World

  • Home
  • Top Solar Contractors
    • 10th Anniversary Roundtables
  • Articles
    • Most Recent Posts
    • News
      • Latest News Items
      • Solar tariffs
    • Featured
      • Latest Feature Stories
      • Contractors Corner
      • Trends in Solar
      • The Solar Explorer
  • Policy
    • Monthly Snapshots
  • Markets
    • Residential
    • Commercial
    • Community Solar
    • Utility
  • Products
    • 2020 Top Products
    • Batteries and Storage
    • Inverters
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
    • Racking and Mounting
    • Software
    • Solar Panels
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • About SPW
    • Digital Issues
    • Event Coverage
    • Leadership
      • 2020 Winners
      • 2019 Winners
      • 2018 Winners
    • Podcasts
    • Product Databases
      • Solar Inverter Models
      • Solar Panel Models
      • Solar Racking Models
      • Battery Storage Models
    • Product Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Inverter Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Solar Panel Manufacturing Locations
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
    • Solar Classrooms
      • Inverters
      • Solar panels
      • Roof-mount systems
      • Ground-mount systems
      • Residential energy storage systems
    • Suppliers
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers

The importance of weather files and P90 for solar developers

By Paul Grana | July 6, 2018

Share

When someone says, “My simulation results aren’t lining up with what I used to see in PV Watts,” our first troubleshooting step (and the most common source of problems) is the weather file. While everyone thinks about the choice of modules or inverters as a major driver of the energy yield, those aren’t as important as the weather file, which can swing yield by 5 to 10%. Yet many engineers barely think about weather files until very late in the solar design process.

Weather files are too important to not understand. Here we will explain the different types of weather files, how they are constructed and why financiers will ask for a discount vs. the standard weather file outputs.

Know your source: satellite vs. ground-based sources

There are two major types of weather files: satellite-based and ground-based. Ground-based files are more ubiquitous in the United States: “TMY2” and “TMY3” files are based on physical weather stations that measure the sunlight (aka irradiance) and temperature over the course of multiple years.

Figure 1: Weather file selection in HelioScope

Satellite-based weather files such as NREL’s Solar Prospector are based on satellite images, where the image is used to calculate the amount of cloud-cover over each spot on the planet. Then a methodology calculates the irradiance loss based on the cloud cover.

In PVWatts, only TMY2/TMY3 files are available, so many people who use PVWatts are baselined to ground-based weather files. There are also premium weather files (of both types) from firms such as Clean Power Research, Solargis, AWS Truepower and 3TIER.

Outside the U.S., satellite-based weather is more common. It is pulled from sources such as Meteonorm and PVGIS, though there are also a number of ground-based sources such as EnergyPlus and SolarGis.

The two types of weather sources can actually have fairly significant differences. As seen from the chart below, Prospector weather files are often more aggressive than TMY3, with an average difference of +2.9% greater production across 20 U.S. metro areas (and some sites seeing nearly a 10% difference):

Figure 2: Prospector weather results vs. TMY3 for Top 20 U.S. metro areas

How TMY is constructed

TMY files are constructed to provide a realistic view of what a “typical” year looks like at a location. There are two objectives in making sure that the data is typical:

  1. Ensure that the overall simulation averages are in line with historical averages
  2. Ensure that the day-to-day and hour-to-hour variations preserve the “noisiness” of the real-world

Note that an “average year” (say, taking the 20-year average for each hour) would satisfy the first objective (having results that are in line with averages), but would not satisfy the second objective. Specifically, all of the highest and lowest values would be smoothed out.

Instead, we construct a “typical year”: calculate the average irradiance and temperature across all of the January months, and then select the single year where the January is closest to the average. But once that “typical January” is selected, all of the specific hourly results are maintained. The result is a synthetic year where the values of each month come from a different year, but the overall sunlight is very close to average, with a normal amount of very sunny/very cloudy days.

Figure 3: Illustrative construction of typical year

This is also why the hourly simulation results from performance models sometimes look funny. The January values might be from 1998, while the February values might be from 2003:

Figure 4: Example hourly simulation file using typical year data

Choosing a weather file

There isn’t a right or wrong source for weather, though there are different approaches for how developers think about weather files.

Some will decide that they prefer to use a specific type (either satellite-based or ground-based), and only use that. The primary argument for satellite-based weather is the consistent methodology: the cloud calculation approach is applied uniformly across regions. For a developer comparing projects across different states or counties, they can be confident that the differences between sites are not caused by differences in how the weather stations are maintained. On the other hand, while ground-based weather sources can vary based on the physical maintenance, they are generally considered to be higher quality, since they are directly measuring the same conditions that the prospective solar array will see.

Others will take a hybrid approach: switching between ground-based and satellite-based on proximity—or even running multiple simulations and using the average (or minimum) value.

Figure 5: Report summary with multiple weather sources

Annual variability and P50 vs. P90

The world is an uncertain place. Even if we had perfect information about what had happened in the past, there are significant differences from year to year. Often, the production of an array can vary by as much as 5 to 10% from year to year.

If we were to look at multiple years of weather data, the overall amount of sunlight follows a normal distribution (a bell curve):

Figure 6: Example normal distribution

In light of that distribution of sunlight, solar developers will talk in terms of “PXX” for finding a spot on the distribution. Specifically, a P50 value is the spot on the curve where half of the years should be greater than the value—in other words, the middle of the curve and the average value. Then, P90 is the spot on the curve where you expect to outperform the value 90% of the time.

Figure 7: P50 and P90 adjustment (Credit: AWS Truepower)

The average, or P50, is the right approach when you are trying to get the most neutral understanding of what a system will do. Since a solar array is essentially a series of cash flows, then arguably the fairest calculation is to base the value off of the average production over that time period.

However, someone is often depending on the revenue from that array, either to pay down a loan used to finance the array or for investment income. And keep in mind that an array will underperform its “average” value 50% of the time (and will also over-perform half of the time). This is why financiers will often require that an array is financed based on the P90 production rather than P50.

While a P90 calculation sounds complicated, it is not that difficult to generate:

  • First find a dataset with multiple years. In the U.S., this includes TMY2 and Solar Prospector.
  • Calculate multiple years of production. Here, more is better—ideally you would want to run every year available (XX years for Prospector and 30 years for TMY2).
  • “Standardize” the multiple years into a normal distribution. For those interested, there is a function in Excel that can do this, =standardize(), or alternatively we have a template calculator here.
  • Finally, using the normal distribution, find the point on the curve that corresponds to the place where 90% of the distribution is to the right. Again, our online calculator does this automatically. Note that if you were going to run a different level, say P80 or P95, you would just calculate a different point on the curve.

In practice, a P90 production value will typically be 2 to 4% lower than the corresponding TMY/P50 value. While it isn’t fun to lose 2 to 4% of the project value in financing, this will ensure that the production is less likely to underperform expectations (though it will still underperform 10% of the time).

You may also like:


  • Too much of a good thing: Inverter hyper-clipping

  • Trending in solar software: Solar software integrations giving users more…

  • Four takeaways from the 2018 S3 Solar Software Summit

  • How does your location affect the optimal inverter size?

  • Central, string or module-level? Getting the right MPPT zone size

About The Author

Paul Grana

Paul Grana is the co-founder of Folsom Labs, where he leads sales and marketing, where he has helped to grow the company to thousands of installers in over 70 countries. He also founded the S3 Solar Software Summit, which brings together the industry’s leading software vendors and buyers each year. He previously worked at Abound Solar, and led product management and technical marketing with Tigo Energy. Paul holds a BS in Mathematics and Economics from the University of Chicago, and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

Tell Us What You Think! Cancel reply

Related Articles Read More >

Swinerton breaks ground on 200-MW National Grid solar project in Illinois
South Carolina PSC approves Duke Energy program to add 200 MW of new large-scale renewables
AC Power, Citrine Power receive municipal approval on land lease for 4.5-MW solar project
Hannah Solar Government Services completes 1.28-MW solar project for Bosch Rexroth

Exclusive SPW Content

Videos Podcasts Webinars Whitepapers

SPW Digital Editions

Solar Power World Digital EditionBrowse the current issue and archived issues of Solar Power World in an easy-to-use, high-quality format. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading solar construction magazine today.

Solar Policy Snapshot

Solar policy differs across state lines and regions. Click to see our monthly roundup of recent legislation and research throughout the country.

Read More >

Popular Posts See More >

Solar investment tax credit extended at 26% for two additional years
SolarJuice American to take over consumer contracts of bankrupt residential solar installer Petersen-Dean
What the Biden administration could mean for solar and storage
The changing state of retiring solar panels
Solar Power World
  • Top Solar Contractors
  • Solar Articles
  • Top Products
  • Leadership
  • WTWH Media
  • About/Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • Windpower Engineering & Development

Copyright © 2021 WTWH Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Solar Power World

  • Home
  • Top Solar Contractors
    • 10th Anniversary Roundtables
  • Articles
    • Most Recent Posts
    • News
      • Latest News Items
      • Solar tariffs
    • Featured
      • Latest Feature Stories
      • Contractors Corner
      • Trends in Solar
      • The Solar Explorer
  • Policy
    • Monthly Snapshots
  • Markets
    • Residential
    • Commercial
    • Community Solar
    • Utility
  • Products
    • 2020 Top Products
    • Batteries and Storage
    • Inverters
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
    • Racking and Mounting
    • Software
    • Solar Panels
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • About SPW
    • Digital Issues
    • Event Coverage
    • Leadership
      • 2020 Winners
      • 2019 Winners
      • 2018 Winners
    • Podcasts
    • Product Databases
      • Solar Inverter Models
      • Solar Panel Models
      • Solar Racking Models
      • Battery Storage Models
    • Product Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Inverter Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Solar Panel Manufacturing Locations
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
    • Solar Classrooms
      • Inverters
      • Solar panels
      • Roof-mount systems
      • Ground-mount systems
      • Residential energy storage systems
    • Suppliers
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers