Solar Power World

  • Home
  • Top Solar Contractors
    • 10th Anniversary Roundtables
  • Articles
    • Most Recent Posts
    • News
      • Latest News Items
      • Solar tariffs
    • Featured
      • Latest Feature Stories
      • Contractors Corner
      • Trends in Solar
      • The Solar Explorer
  • Policy
    • Monthly Snapshots
  • Markets
    • Residential
    • Commercial
    • Community Solar
    • Utility
  • Products
    • 2020 Top Products
    • Batteries and Storage
    • Inverters
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
    • Racking and Mounting
    • Software
    • Solar Panels
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • About SPW
    • Digital Issues
    • Event Coverage
    • Leadership
      • 2020 Winners
      • 2019 Winners
      • 2018 Winners
    • Podcasts
    • Product Databases
      • Solar Inverter Models
      • Solar Panel Models
      • Solar Racking Models
      • Battery Storage Models
    • Product Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Inverter Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Solar Panel Manufacturing Locations
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
    • Solar Classrooms
      • Inverters
      • Solar panels
      • Roof-mount systems
      • Ground-mount systems
      • Residential energy storage systems
    • Suppliers
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers

How does your location affect the optimal inverter size?

By Paul Grana | April 5, 2018

Share

By Paul Grana, co-founder of Folsom Labs

We previously showed that over-power clipping losses are not nearly as high as people typically think. A commercial system in Atlanta with a DC/AC ratio of 1.3 would have just 0.5% of over-power clipping loss. However, that analysis just looked at one location. We find that the results will change significantly based on where the array is located. And that not only will the system performance change, but it can lead to differences in system design from one location to another.

Sunlight (and clipping) varies by location

We chose Atlanta because it was middle-of-the-road in terms of sunlight received. If we look at other cities that are popular for solar, we can see that annual sunlight ranges from over 2,100 W/m2 in Phoenix to just over 1,100 W/m2 in Seattle.Of course, this isn’t exactly news that Arizona gets more sun than Washington does, but less obvious is the impact it has on over-power clipping losses. To visualize this, we can organize the number of hours spent at each level of sunlight intensity.

The intensity of sunlight has a close relationship to clipping losses. A system clips when the DC power is larger than the inverter’s rated output power, so the number of hours that a system spends at or near its peak output determines how much energy will be lost due to clipping. Note how many hours Phoenix has at peak production—a full 200 hours where the modules are receiving more than 1,000 W/m2! As a result, the clipping losses in Phoenix are nearly twice that of the arrays in Atlanta or Seattle.

Impact on optimal system design

This relationship between sunlight and clipping loss doesn’t just change the energy calculations. It has implications for the optimal system design that an engineer will implement.

For example, if a designer has a target of 1.5% clipping loss, this would result in a 1.3 DC-to-AC ratio in Phoenix, and a 1.45 DC-to-AC ratio in Spokane. A designer in Washington could save ~15% on inverter costs compared to the same designer in Arizona, and maintain the identical system efficiency.

Ultimately, a designer assembling systems in a range of locations is likely to end up with a different inverter-to-array sizing at each location. And the upside of designing in low-irradiance locations like Boston or Seattle is that you can save a bit of money on inverter costs!

About The Author

Paul Grana

Paul Grana is the co-founder of Folsom Labs, where he leads sales and marketing, where he has helped to grow the company to thousands of installers in over 70 countries. He also founded the S3 Solar Software Summit, which brings together the industry’s leading software vendors and buyers each year. He previously worked at Abound Solar, and led product management and technical marketing with Tigo Energy. Paul holds a BS in Mathematics and Economics from the University of Chicago, and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

Comments

  1. Kelsey A says

    September 14, 2020 at 4:02 pm

    Hi everyone – I live in the Phoenix, Arizona area, and my installer put in 34x340W (11.56kWh) panels coupled with a SolarEdge SE7600 (7.6kWh) inverter…this works out to 1.52 to 1.00 DC to AC power feeding the inverter. The salesperson informed me when he sold me the system that I was purchasing the maximum number of panels for my 200A service breaker box… I was fine with this, as I didn’t want to increase the size of my breaker box. The salesperson for this solar company never informed me that I would be losing power – or that the limiting factor would be the 7.6kW inverter (vs. the number of panels). I am clipping for 3-4 hours per day in September, and the best solar irradiation for Phoenix is March through August, so I can only imagine how bad this clipping will get. In addition, I have overheated my inverter whereby it “self-protects” and reduces power even more than the 7.6kWh. I believe the solar company did a horrible job matching the inverter design for this part of the country for the number of panels they sold me, and I feel as if they totally were out to make a fast buck on panels vs. sizing the inverter correctly for the job. It seems unconscionable to install 1.52 to 1.00 DC/AC ratio for Phoenix, and I think it should be no worse than 1.2 to 1.0 for an acceptable level of clipping. What do you think? They should have told me not to purchase as many panels, or that they would upgrade the service panel to 400A or they could have even downsized the main breaker to 175A to be able to put in a 60A circuit for the inverter and installed a more appropriately sized 11.4kWh inverter… I expected the solar company to have integrity and to put in the most effective/efficient system, but the inverter for Phoenix seems to be severely undersized. Am I the only one thinking this is completely wrong of the solar company?

    Reply
    • Randall Cajthaml says

      February 9, 2021 at 2:12 am

      Hi Kelsey,
      I have a 14.28 kW system in phoenix with the 10k inverter (SE10000H). I was initially concerned about clipping. After 5 days I’ve seen clipping each day (we’ve had clear skies and cool weather).
      I did some calculations and at 3.5 hours of clipping per day that’s about 12% loss.
      I’m at 1.428:1 DC/AC ratio and I think this could be too much for phoenix. I’m going to reach out to my installer and see about the 11.4kW inverter (SE11400H). I feel like I’ll get the runaround and the 10k is within the SolarEdge specs (15.5k) 1.55:1.
      I might also reach out to SolarEdge and get their input as well.

      Reply
  2. Michael Emmons says

    April 12, 2018 at 12:56 pm

    Am I clipping too much? I tend to think so. (but I’m very new to solar).

    I have a SolarEdge 7.6 SE7600H-us inverter
    38 300w Heliene panels 38 * 300w = 11.4kw
    located in Longwood, FL 32779 (outside Orlando)

    Yesterday, 4/11/2018, I clipped most of the day. On 3/22, 3/23, 3/24, 3/28 I clipped just about the entire day.

    https://monitoringpublic.solaredge.com/solaredge-web/p/site/public?name=Emmons11.4kw&locale=en_US#/dashboard

    Thank you, Mike

    Reply
    • Hans Frederickson says

      April 12, 2018 at 3:12 pm

      Hi Mike,
      Your DC to AC ratio is 1.5, which is allowable for your 7.6kW HD Wave inverter (1.55 is the limit from SolarEdge). Your installer probably selected this inverter, rather than a larger one, in order to have a simple tie-in to a 40-Amp circuit breaker in the electrical service panel. Your clipping in Orlando is probably similar to Atlanta, or slightly higher, which from the graph in this article, appears to be a little over 3% per year at a ratio of 1.5. If you were in Phoenix, I would say your system as designed would probably clip too much at over 5% loss. In Orlando, it’s just a value decision taken by your installer. A larger inverter would cost you more both for the inverter itself as well as the work required to connect it to your electrical service (probably a line side tap, or service reconfiguration of some sort). Assuming your designer/installer considered those costs, they probably gave you the system with better payback, regardless of the clipping. Hopefully your installer gave you some details on expected monthly/annual energy production and payback. As long as your system is performing as expected, taking into account weather variations, I wouldn’t worry about it.
      Regards,
      -Hans

      Reply
      • Mark Bortman says

        April 12, 2018 at 9:04 pm

        Also, the HD Wave inverter is more efficient than the older style SolarEdge inverters. So although you may be losing a percent or two due to clipping, you’re gaining a percent or so due to increased efficiency.

        Reply

Tell Us What You Think! Cancel reply

Related Articles Read More >

Is permitting killing your solar business? Help may be an orange button away
Solar Power World celebrates the 10th anniversary of the Top Solar Contractors list in 2021
Virginia sets example for fair HOA solar policy
Other states can look to the commonwealth as a guide, but the law is still not flawless.
Contractors Corner: Shine Solar

Exclusive SPW Content

Videos Podcasts Webinars Whitepapers

SPW Digital Editions

Solar Power World Digital EditionBrowse the current issue and archived issues of Solar Power World in an easy-to-use, high-quality format. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading solar construction magazine today.

Solar Policy Snapshot

Solar policy differs across state lines and regions. Click to see our monthly roundup of recent legislation and research throughout the country.

Read More >

Popular Posts See More >

Solar investment tax credit extended at 26% for two additional years
SolarJuice American to take over consumer contracts of bankrupt residential solar installer Petersen-Dean
What the Biden administration could mean for solar and storage
The changing state of retiring solar panels
Solar Power World
  • Top Solar Contractors
  • Solar Articles
  • Top Products
  • Leadership
  • WTWH Media
  • About/Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • Windpower Engineering & Development

Copyright © 2021 WTWH Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Solar Power World

  • Home
  • Top Solar Contractors
    • 10th Anniversary Roundtables
  • Articles
    • Most Recent Posts
    • News
      • Latest News Items
      • Solar tariffs
    • Featured
      • Latest Feature Stories
      • Contractors Corner
      • Trends in Solar
      • The Solar Explorer
  • Policy
    • Monthly Snapshots
  • Markets
    • Residential
    • Commercial
    • Community Solar
    • Utility
  • Products
    • 2020 Top Products
    • Batteries and Storage
    • Inverters
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
    • Racking and Mounting
    • Software
    • Solar Panels
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • About SPW
    • Digital Issues
    • Event Coverage
    • Leadership
      • 2020 Winners
      • 2019 Winners
      • 2018 Winners
    • Podcasts
    • Product Databases
      • Solar Inverter Models
      • Solar Panel Models
      • Solar Racking Models
      • Battery Storage Models
    • Product Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Inverter Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Solar Panel Manufacturing Locations
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
    • Solar Classrooms
      • Inverters
      • Solar panels
      • Roof-mount systems
      • Ground-mount systems
      • Residential energy storage systems
    • Suppliers
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers