Based on the latest solar supplier market report from technical advisory Clean Energy Associates, significant expansions of polysilicon production is already occurring outside Xinjiang, China, but China as a whole still dominates.
Read more about the polysilicon and solar battle between China and the United States here.
The “Q2 PV Supplier Market Intelligence Program (SMIP) Report for 2021,” available by subscription, is authored by CEA’s Technology and Quality team and includes insights gathered from in-depth interviews and analysis of many of the solar industry’s leading manufacturers.
Sizeable pipelines for new polysilicon expansions continue to be built with over 1.2 million tons expected to be online by 2023. Although the majority of expansions (72%) are planned for outside of Xinjiang, the vast majority (89%) of global polysilicon production is still expected to take place within China. Non-Chinese-based polysilicon capacity is expected to exceed 130,000 tons by 2023 (11% of global capacity), with the majority located in Germany and the United States.
Most major Chinese polysilicon providers are looking at expansions exceeding 100,000 tons; only Daqo has not detailed a significant boost in new production capacity. Small expansions from incumbents such as OCI, Ordos, Youser, and others are also underway, although these suppliers are eclipsed by the scale of major market players. Xinjiang Jingnuo, a new supplier, announced intentions to develop polysilicon production in Xinjiang this past quarter and will target 100,000 tons of production capacity if permits are approved by government bodies.
Global solar module production expectations
Through surveys with leading module suppliers, CEA believes that around 400 GW of total nameplate module manufacturing capacity and nearly 325 GW of nameplate cell capacity could be online by the end of 2021. China and Taiwan are expected to remain the top production locations, together accounting for over 85% of global cell manufacturing capacity and around 75% of global module manufacturing capacity. Southeast Asia is the second top production location for cell and module suppliers, holding around 9% and 13% of the global cell and module production capacities, respectively.
Despite this large production potential, wafer, cell, and module suppliers faced difficulties due to persistent shortages of polysilicon and a subsequent rise in its price. Furthermore, rising prices of steel, aluminum, and copper, along with surging freight charges further led to increased project costs, creating weak demand during the first half of 2021 for most markets. Even with these challenges, global supplies of both cells and modules are expected to expand throughout the forecast period. Large developers have already started construction on large manufacturing complexes and most maintain plans to bring new capacity online.
Europe is latest hotspot for solar manufacturing
Despite COVID-19 pandemic, demand for solar in the European Union region increased to 18.2 GW in 2020 from 16.2 GW in 2019. The region is revising several policies and regulations to achieve its carbon-neutrality goal by 2050 which is expected to offer strong advantages to solar and other renewable energy sources. Increasing focus on building a resilient domestic solar PV supply chain while reducing the reliance on Chinese imports is expected to attract suppliers to set up their facilities in this region.
However, Europe’s solar manufacturing ecosystem is currently limited by wafer and cell production which accounts for less than 20% of total module production. Wacker remains the sole producer of polysilicon in the region, with few ingots or wafer producers situated in Europe to buy its polysilicon outputs. The lack of cost-effective wafer and cell production is also increasing module imports from China.
With module production capacity around 25% of module demand in the European Union, most of all installed capacity in Europe can be traced back to China.
Although solar PV cell and module suppliers keep announcing new capacity expansion plans, with polysilicon suppliers still needing several quarters to bring new production online, and logistics challenges not expected to abate in 2021, solar projects in many key markets are at risk of being pushed to 2022 and module manufacturers may not reach desired shipment figures this year.
News item from CEA
It’s almost like the west doesn’t want to be green.
Your military contractors sponsors think tanks like ASPI to generate “reports”, your NED and USAGM funded NGO/Media report “forced labour”. If it’s not Adrian Zenz (fundamental Christian), it’s ASPI (sponsor by Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Thales, Raytheon), if it’s not ASPI, it’s world Uyghur Congress (NED funded). Your head of pentagon hold a massive bag of Raytheon shares.
Given American history, it’s no wonder Americans can’t imagine a country harvesting cotton by any means other than slave labour… Even when it’s now entirely automated, and slave would be uneconomical/unproductive.
But hey, it’s best if we all drown than to admit that US hegemony is cancer right?
The “thing” that bothers me about the U.S. manufacturing of polysilicon, is the dynamics over the past say 30 years, where Corporations start up manufacturing in the U.S., get tax credits from “technology incubator” programs and after a few years, off shore this manufacturing using the inverted tax program. This is why the big deal over Trump’s Federal taxes were said to be $750 dollars, the loop holes are there and there have been many Congresses that could have taken care of this problem, but didn’t.
As far as I know REC in Washington State is still intact and ready to manufacture product using cheap hydro-electric power. If this is such a big deal, then why isn’t REC online and feeding polysilicon to the American market today?
Because there are no American wafer or cell companies to take REC’s polysilicon.
Looked at the REC site and it has been kept up and revised in 2021, but there was one statement, “..The Norwegian polysilicon maker..” perhaps it has signed a multi-year MOU with China and would be more to the point of not being able to manufacture for any other entity other than the original MOU. Tariffs would make the products price prohibitive and now perhaps legally produced in America polysilicon, but, “Chinese” polysilicon contracted to China. The site also mentions this site has been in operations since the 1980’s. From the way the REC web site states, products as polysilicon and it looks like crystalline ingots and wafers for electronics and also silane gases for manufacturing.
Perhaps Corporate America has been looking at this all wrong. Miasole I believe in some form is still in business, Nanosolar took off like a rocket in reel to reel printed CIGS panels, expanded to Germany then filed for bankruptcy. I find it interesting that these early manufacturing attempts still have viable chemistry and manufacturing “treatises” as to how to manufacture a product from raw elements to finished product. First Solar found a successful niche in thin film panels, it is time to take this “role model” into the CIGS and perovskite tandem panel manufacturing arena.
Ever visited any polysilicon factory? It is too dangerous and detrimental to use any careless person, not to mention forced labor. What a joke!
Search the almost idled Wacker Charleston for all kinds of explosions.
you are the man awake.