Solar contractors face many decisions when it comes to finding the best solar design. One important consideration is determining whether to use module-level power electronics (microinverters or DC optimizers).
Once costly specialty products, module-level power electronics have made great strides in the last decade and are rapidly growing in popularity. And there’s good reason for that! Incorporating these devices can offer a number of design benefits.
In today’s article, we explore some of the benefits of module-level power electronics and take a closer look at each type and where they fit within a PV system design.
What are Module-Level Power Electronics (MLPE)?
Module-level power electronics (MLPE) are devices that can be incorporated into a solar PV system to improve its performance in certain conditions (especially where shade is present) and to achieve a number of other solar design benefits. MLPE options include microinverters and DC power optimizers. They perform some of the same functions as a string inverter or central inverter, but are typically coupled to just one (or a few) solar modules rather than many, and offer additional features.
Figure 1. Even partial shade, as shown here, can significantly reduce the power output of a solar array; MLPE–including microinverters and DC optimizers–can mitigate these performance losses, among other benefits.
Why use MLPE?
There are a number of reasons why incorporating MLPE into your solar designs can be a good option. One of the primary reasons is to improve the energy production of the system. MLPE can help mitigate production losses from a variety of different factors such as shading, module mismatch losses and orientation mismatch losses (for instance, if you have panels on different roof planes).
The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy explains that MLPE can reduce energy losses due to partial shading of modules by 20% to 35% and they completely eliminate losses due to orientation mismatch of PV modules.
Additional benefits of MLPE include providing compliance with module-level rapid shutdown requirements under the National Electrical Code (NEC), safety benefits and typically longer warranties than for traditional inverters. Most MLPE products also come with performance monitoring and diagnostic functionality, which can be valuable in making sure the system is producing as expected or pinpointing technical issues.
Solar contractors may want to weigh these benefits against possible higher up-front costs and increased installation labor.
How can MLPE improve PV system performance?
MLPE can improve the energy production of a solar PV system by performing maximum power point tracking at the module level, rather than at the array level as would be the case with a string inverter. Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) refers to how inverters (and MLPE) instruct a solar panel or array to operate at a specific current and voltage combination that maximizes power output.
Inverters and DC optimizers perform maximum power point tracking by responding to changes in the current and voltage of the solar installation (for example, a decrease in current resulting from shade falling on the panel). They respond to these changes by adjusting the voltage to maximize power output. (For a deeper discussion of this process, and the relationship between current, voltage and power, see our article on global MPPT.)
In a system with a string inverter and no MLPE, shade or soiling on one module can decrease the power output of the entire string. This is because, as detailed in our overview of shading losses, the current through the string is limited to the current of the lowest-producing module. In contrast, in systems with microinverters or DC optimizers, each module will produce at its maximum level regardless of shading on other modules on the string because these devices offer module-level MPPT functionality.
DC power optimizers
DC power optimizers, commonly called DC optimizers, are attached to the junction box of individual solar modules, or in the case of some “smart modules” may be integrated directly into the module. These devices maximize the module’s DC power output before that power is converted to AC power by an inverter. As discussed above, they achieve this by providing MPPT at the module level, so that each module produces at its maximum level regardless of shading on other modules on the string.
When using DC optimizers, a string inverter is still required to convert the energy produced from DC to AC (see Figure 4 below for a comparison of system configurations with DC optimizers, microinverters and traditional string inverters).
Figure 2. An example of DC optimizer products. Source: Tigo. The products pictured are part of Tigo’s TS4 Platform. Pictured on the left is the back of an integrated smart module in which a DC optimizer is installed before the module leaves the factory. On the right is an add-on optimizer which can be fitted to a standard module. Click on the image to view Tigo’s video guide to optimizer installation.
Discussing the benefits of her company’s DC optimizers, Gal Bauer, director of customer care at Tigo, a leading MLPE manufacturer, said, “Tigo’s DC-DC optimizers—the integrated TS4-O and the retrofit/add-on TS4-R-O—increase solar production, reduce shade impacts, prevent burnt diodes and delay other aging effects that degrade a system’s performance over time. Tigo’s optimizers also include matched module warranties as well as a built-in UL-certified rapid shutdown solution and module-level monitoring with sophisticated alerts. These unique features purposefully keep costs of ownership at record lows and revenues at record highs for our customers.”
As their name implies, microinverters are similar to traditional inverters but operate just one or, in some cases, a few modules rather than the full array. Like a string inverter or central inverter, they convert the DC power produced by the panels to AC power that can be sent to the grid and used in the home.
In addition to the benefits of MLPE discussed above, such as improving performance through module-level MPPT, microinverters can offer increased design flexibility. For instance, systems with microinverters can more easily be expanded at a later date if that is something the customer is considering (such as if they purchase an electric vehicle). Whereas string inverters have specific string length requirements, those considerations are avoided in systems with microinverters. Additionally, while not something you would commonly design, microinverters would allow for different types of modules to be used in the same system.
Figure 3. An example of a microinverter. Source: Enphase.
How does MLPE fit into your solar design?
Both microinverters and DC optimizers are attached to individual modules in a solar array (though as referenced above, there are some microinverters that operate multiple panels). If using microinverters, you will not need a string inverter for the system. If you are using DC optimizers, the panels will be connected in series to a string inverter. The figure below compares the installation configurations for these two options to a design without MLPE.
Figure 4. An illustration of PV system configurations depending on whether MLPE options like DC optimizers or microinverters are used. As you can see, DC optimizers still require a string inverter, while microinverters do not. Both options are typically connected to individual solar panels. Source: Aurora.
In contrast to systems with microinverters, in which every panel must be connected to a microinverter, DC optimizers can sometimes be deployed selectively. This is the case for Tigo’s selective deployment capabilities, in which MLPE devices that perform different functions can be attached to specific modules as needed. For instance, if shading only affects selected modules in your system, DC optimizers could be added to those specific modules so that they will not bring down the power output of the rest of the string.
Finding the optimal PV design for your customer can be a challenging proposition, but being aware of the diverse benefits of different components can help. Module-level power electronics can be a great option to maximize system performance, enable greater design flexibility and capture other benefits. As with all design considerations, being able to quantify the performance impacts with accurate solar design software like Aurora can help ensure that you’re making the best design choices for the customer.
Software with integrated financial analysis tools can also help you to understand if a potential increase in the up-front cost of the system is justified based on the value of the additional energy the system will produce. Aurora models the precise impacts of DC optimizers and microinverters based on manufacturer specifications and is a leader in accurate modeling of complex MLPE functionality. For instance, it was the first software to simulate Selective Deployment of Tigo’s optimization.
The next time you confront solar design challenges like shade, modules on different roof faces or the need to support future expansion of the PV system, consider MLPE as a possible solution.
jim huang says
A good paper for the MLPE introduction.
Do you have a mkt data that how many systems have been integrated with MLPE in US market up to now?
However, the MLPE still could not fix two major issues because of the shaded module (1）MLPE could not fix the shaded module itself power loss and (2) could not relief the higher temperature heat of the hot-spot on the shaded cell yet. Technicially the MPPT of the system is bascially depend on the inverter MPPT, so the MLPE MPPT was not that critical important to the module outputs. by the way, curretn MPLE will cost about US0.05/Wdc at least and normally how many years the owenr could achieve the break-even for the installation of the MLPE, you have a calculation model?
thanks for your paper and further discussion.