
AgriSolar Clearinghouse
The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (NJBPU) on Dec. 7 established the Competitive Solar Incentive (CSI) Program, a new program designed to encourage grid scale solar generation in New Jersey. CSI is a key part of the State’s Successor Solar Incentive initiative (SuSI), which was enacted by the Board in 2021 and is expected to significantly increase the State’s Solar program at a lower cost for ratepayers.
The new CSI program has a goal of incentivizing at least 300 MW of solar annually until 2026. The CSI program will primarily cover large projects, including all types of grid supply projects and net-metered, non-residential projects greater than 5 MW.
“The CSI program is a vital component of our new SuSI program and will play a major part in helping us meet our solar goals while decreasing costs to ratepayers,” said NJBPU president Joseph L. Fiordaliso. “Our growing solar program, which not only includes CSI and ADI but also community solar, is one of the core programs in achieving Governor Murphy’s goal of a 100 percent clean energy future.”
SEIA said the new program design details will help ensure New Jersey continues to make progress on clean energy and offer a positive path forward for competitive solar and storage deployment in the Garden State.
“SEIA is pleased that the BPU took significant parts of the solar industry’s comments into account in its final design of the Competitive Solar Incentive (CSI) program. The guidelines released today establish a competitive solicitation process for 300 MW of annual large-scale solar development in New Jersey, as well as targeted procurement of 160 MWh of energy storage paired with grid-scale solar per year,” said Sean Gallagher, VP of state and regulatory affairs for SEIA, in a press statement.
“SEIA and its members are evaluating the program’s construction and siting requirements, including new standards for pollinator-friendly ground-mounted projects and various land development restrictions,” he continued. “Establishing a workable siting process is critical for the solar industry to achieve the CSI program’s goal for 1,500 MW of large-scale solar capacity by the end of the decade.”
In addition to CSI, the SuSI program consists of the Administratively Determined Incentive (ADI) Program, which has been open for registrations since the beginning of the SuSI program on August 28, 2021. The ADI program set incentives for net-metered residential projects, net-metered non-residential projects of 5 MW or less and Community Solar projects.
The CSI program is designed to provide maximum benefit to ratepayers at the lowest cost; support the continued growth of the solar industry; meet Governor Murphy’s commitment to 50% class I RECs by 2030 and 100% clean energy by 2050; provide insight and information to stakeholders through a transparent process for developing New Jersey’s long-term solar incentive program; and fully comply with the Solar Act of 2021.
The new program structure has separate categories, or tranches, to ensure that a range of solar project types, including those on preferred sites, are able to participate despite potentially different project cost profiles. The Board has approved four tranches for grid supply and large net metered solar and an additional fifth tranche for storage in combination with grid supply solar. The tranches and initial annual procurement targets are given below.
After receiving an award in the solicitation, CSI projects will have three years to come on-line.
The CSI Program design has siting requirements that apply to all projects eligible for the CSI Program, regardless of whether they actually seek an incentive. These siting requirements follow stipulations laid out in the Solar Act of 2021 and establish construction requirements designed to uphold the mandate to “minimize, as much as is practicable, potential adverse environmental impacts.”
Solicitations will take place annually, and all projects that meet pre-qualification requirements will compete on price only. The first solicitation is scheduled to take place early 2023, with bids due on March 31, 2023.
For full details, see the Board Order.
News item from
It’s the so called tranche 5 that needs a LOT of thought and attention in the years ahead. The redox flow battery is becoming more than a pilot test energy storage program, but a viable multi-hour ESS to service the grid by storing and time shifting energy during the day by solar PV and by night with Wind turbines. Some electric utility entity will have to sooner or later fund a 1GWh plus redox flow battery to serve the regional energy needs in its service area. I have come across no narratives about hybrid ESS that are designed in a modular manner, can take energy from solar PV, wind generation at anytime and could also take energy from multiple feeders into a switching station and shuttle the energy from one feeder system to another feeder system distributing stored capacity to where it is needed in a particular electricity service region. Unlike Peaker plants, switched massive energy storage for a region would represent many possible revenue streams and much more hours of use daily from a regional ESS than a Peaker plant. Amortization of the ESS would be a lot sooner than that of a Peaker plant.
For instance in Australia the so called “Big Battery” installed across a wind farm has been used to allow the wind farm as a dispatchable “emergency” energy resource. It seems an emergency repair of one of the main feeders into a particular area used the wind farm and big battery as the emergency resource while the repair was done. (Normally) this would have required ‘spot market’ capacity that would have cost the customers $1,000/MWh, with the wind farm and big battery the cost of emergency dispatch cost to the customers $300/MWh.