The Nature Conservancy has released a map to help companies and communities identify the most promising places in the central U.S. to quickly develop renewable energy while avoiding impacts to important wildlife and habitats, called Site Renewables Right. The new analysis combines more than 100 GIS layers of wildlife habitat and land use data, helping to find areas where renewable energy development is most likely to avoid important natural areas, permitting delays and cost overruns.
This first-of-its-kind map puts the latest research and data on the best places to source renewable energy in the hands of companies and communities. The Site Renewables Right map spans 19 states, from Ohio to Wyoming.
All told, Site Renewables Right estimates at least 120,000 square miles, an area larger than Arizona, hold the potential for low-conflict renewable energy siting in the central United States. The analysis suggests these areas could support approximately 1,000 GW of wind capacity — nearly 10 times the current U.S. wind capacity.
“To tackle climate change, we need to transition to renewable energy, and fast. Site Renewables Right finds there is huge opportunity to do this at a large-scale across the central United States, without significant impacts to habitat and wildlife,” said Nathan Cummins, director of renewable energy programs for The Nature Conservancy’s Great Plains Division. “Like any type of development, solar and wind facilities can harm wildlife and habitat if not sited properly. Site Renewables Right provides a way for companies and communities to assess those impacts. It encourages the right conversations to avoid project delays and impacts to the very same wildlife and natural areas we are trying to protect from climate change.”
Identifying low-conflict places for renewable energy in the region is critical, as the central United States is home to North America’s largest and most intact temperate grasslands, among the most altered and least-protected habitats in the world. It is “home on the range” for iconic wildlife such as bison, eagles, pronghorn, deer and prairie chickens.
“Renewable energy and transmission are critical to reducing emissions and slowing global temperature rise to ensure a cleaner future for both people and wildlife,” stated Garry George, director of the Clean Energy Initiative for the National Audubon Society. “The Site Renewables Right tool plays an important role in Audubon’s analysis of clean energy planning and individual projects to make sure that conservation and renewables go hand-in-hand.”
With up to 75% of the nation’s large renewable energy projects expected to be developed in the 19-state region by 2050, tools such as Site Renewables Right can help companies, state agencies, and communities quickly plan, permit, and purchase renewable energy in ways that helps conserve natural areas.
News item from The Nature Conservancy
Henry Geddes says
Very useful and timely. Question: Why were the two coasts excluded? Is it because they are less viable options compared to the central portion of the country?
Bob Landwehr says
Clean Power Alliance (CPA) is the largest renewable energy supplier in the country. “CPA and The Nature Conservancy have collaborated on a unique web-based mapping tool to screen long-term energy project proposals. This mapping tool communicates environmental risks and benefits of proposed projects, factors which CPA uses in its process of evaluating and selecting new energy suppliers.” (CPA and The Nature Conservancy Drive Environmental Stewardship in Renewable Energy Development, CPA 2020 Impact Report)
“Clean Power Alliance is proud of these reliable carbon-free facilities that are now in production. These projects help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while further improving rate stability and reliability for our customers” “We will follow these projects up with 250 MW of new battery storage in 2021, which will further ensure the transition to a low-carbon grid is done both safely and reliably.”
Ted Bardacke, Executive Director for CPA, March 11, 2021 South Pasadena.com
The High Desert Solar-plus-Storage facility is a lynch pin for wildfire. It is surrounded by a “continuous fuel bed for fire to spread.” “Covered activities have the potential to trigger wildfires within the Permit Boundary and vicinity.” (FINAL Low Effect Habitat Conservation Plan High Desert Solar Project)
The biggest effect wildfire has on wildlife habitat is by altering three things animals need most: food, water and shelter. The 642-acre High Desert Solar-plus-Storage facility has NO water on site or nearby.
There was no Environmental Impact Report completed for the project. The Draft Study Mitigated Negative Declaration falsely claimed Victorville FS #319 would respond for fire and emergency services. Not True. FS #319 does not have wildfire apparatus and is prohibited to respond per FAA regulations. The closest fire station is 23 minutes away. In a high wind, high temperature and low humidity environment already prone to wildfires, The Nature Conservancy was really okay with this?
According to the California Air Resources Board, “Wildfires release carbon dioxide emissions and other greenhouse gases (GHG) that contribute to climate change.” Green Energy profits have trumped public safety and common sense. Our family campground is in the center of the power plant.