Solar Power World

  • Home
  • Top Solar Contractors
  • Articles
    • Most Recent Posts
    • News
      • Latest News Items
      • SPW State News Hub
      • IRA coverage
      • Solar tariffs
      • U.S. manufacturing updates
    • Featured
      • Latest Feature Stories
      • Contractor’s Corner
      • Trends in Solar
      • The Solar Explorer
  • Policy
    • The Solar Policy Scoop
    • IRA Coverage
  • Markets
    • Residential
    • Commercial
    • Community Solar
    • Utility
  • Products
    • Winners of SPW’s 2024 Top Products
    • Batteries and Storage
    • Electric Vehicle (EV)
    • Inverters
      • U.S. solar inverter manufacturers
    • Racking and Mounting
      • U.S. solar mounting manufacturers
    • Software
    • Solar Panels
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
  • Resources
    • About SPW
    • Digital Issues
    • Event Coverage
    • Podcasts
    • Product Manufacturing Locations
      • U.S. solar inverter manufacturers
      • U.S. solar mounting manufacturers
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
    • Solar Classrooms
    • Suppliers
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Florida legislature considers ending solar net metering

By Kelsey Misbrener | November 23, 2021

Share

Update 03/07/2022: The Florida legislature has passed SB 1024, sending the bill to Gov. Ron DeSantis’s desk.

Legislation filed yesterday in the Florida Legislature aims to end net metering for rooftop solar customers, effectively shutting down this key sector of the state economy and undermining energy freedom for tens of thousands of Floridians.

Republican Sen. Jennifer Bradley introduced SB 1024, which aims to “revise and provide legislative findings relating to the redesign of net metering to avoid cross-subsidization of electric service costs between classes of ratepayers” and require the Public Service Commission to propose new net metering rules that comply with specified criteria by a certain date; while authorizing certain customers who own or lease renewable generation before a specified date to remain under the existing net metering rules for a specified time.

National and state solar advocates are calling on lawmakers to reject this legislation and allow the state’s rooftop solar market to continue growing.

“This is a tired tactic that utilities have used to maintain their monopoly grip on electricity markets. Net metering is a popular program that gives people the right to choose the energy that works for them, provides benefits to all ratepayers and creates thousands of energy jobs across Florida. The bill is another of a long line of cynical efforts carried out in the state of Florida at the behest of monopoly utilities to the detriment of Florida residents,” said Will Giese, southeast regional director for SEIA, in a statement. “Stripping Floridians of their right to choose solar is simply bad policy. The bill does not consider the many benefits that solar provides to all ratepayers and it will weaken one of the fastest-growing sectors in Florida’s economy. Florida has the second-largest solar workforce in the country and ranks third among states for installed solar capacity. The state is poised to maintain its solar leadership in the years ahead, but this bill would stamp out that economic growth just as it is ramping up.”

Justin Vandenbroeck, president of the Florida Solar Energy Industries Association (FlaSEIA), said his organization is still analyzing the full impact of the legislation.

“Initial modeling suggests this plan has the potential to set the rooftop solar industry back nearly a decade, erasing thousands of jobs, ending consumer choice and eliminating savings, along with the resiliency benefits that rooftop solar offers to Floridians,” Vandenbroeck said in a statement. “We look forward to working with state policymakers to protect local jobs, consumer choice and the economic development produced through the vibrant solar market in the Sunshine State.”

News item from SEIA

You may also like:


  • California and Florida solar markets have similar demands in different…

About The Author

Kelsey Misbrener

Kelsey Misbrener is currently managing editor of Solar Power World and has been reporting on policy, technology and other areas of the U.S. solar market since 2017.

Comments

  1. Neal says

    February 2, 2022 at 12:41 pm

    There are two simple ways around this business. Install a hybrid system that only draws from the grid when solar and battery are insufficient or install Zero Export Grid Tie. Eliminate the grid tie meter fees, insurance, capacity fees, etc. If equipped with battery, ZEGT can provide power around the clock. These solutions cost a little more up front, but quickly pay back in savings. With the hybrid version, the lights stay on after the hurricane when the grid is down. Any business selling grid-tie systems in some areas is doing its customers a disservice.

    Reply
  2. DCPowers says

    December 13, 2021 at 10:53 pm

    Utilities make money on return on Capital invested. Generation and Distribution must be split but that failed in the early 2000’s on the Federal Level. Think Death Care is screwed up? Look at the IOU’s.

    Reply
  3. Bryan Lagos says

    December 6, 2021 at 8:59 am

    It’s not that big of a deal for me personally (but I can certainly see how horrible this is for most people and the solar industry in general). My response will be to buy batteries and to go completely off the grid. Duke can say “goodbye” to the $13 that I send them every month for the metering service.

    Reply
    • Jennifer says

      January 16, 2022 at 6:40 pm

      It’s illegal to be off grid in the state of Florida. So your solution is not an option, and if net metering goes away off grid becomes even more of a pipe dream.

      Reply
      • Srsf says

        January 24, 2022 at 12:00 am

        Can you reference the law that says you cant generate your own power in florida?

        Reply
        • Susan Hunter says

          February 1, 2022 at 10:06 am

          That is a good question that I have not found yet. Years ago I recall reading about a woman in the Keys who went off all public utilities. I think the outcome was she went to court and lost. I have no idea what she had set up in place. But, with as many of us with solar today, FPL might be subject to monopoly case and lose. I do not believe the motive is entirely homes. Instead I believe FPL does not want to lose large businesses and corporations to solar ownership if they can’t own the source.

          Reply
      • Neal says

        February 2, 2022 at 12:31 pm

        Not illegal. Law says that you must be connected to an “approved” power system. If the county inspector says it is ok, it is ok. I remember a time when not all my school mates had electricity…and now it is mandated. I think this came from UN Agenda 21 and a requirement that properties be maintained in a certain way. That is curious in that an awful lot of people in the world live in tin shacks and mud huts, but we don’t get to choose.

        Reply
  4. NKwanda Jah says

    November 29, 2021 at 1:36 pm

    Time to alert the residents of Florida that this is taking place

    Reply
  5. Patrick e mahoney says

    November 27, 2021 at 6:43 am

    We need to find out who authored the bill and who is contributing to her campaign and when we discover the connection between the author and the senator we need to expose the connection and prosecute the illegal and unethical activities that are attempting to control out ability to pursue or freedoms as americans. Our ancestors gave us our freedom and its up to us to give it to our future generations. This Senator is obviously not able to understand her responsibilities or worse doesn’t care about our freedom.

    Reply
  6. Solarman says

    November 24, 2021 at 5:12 pm

    “National and state solar advocates are calling on lawmakers to reject this legislation and allow the state’s rooftop solar market to continue growing.”

    In California it was a Democrat candidate that sponsored AB1134 that proposed excess energy at the wholesale rate and a $65 to $90 “connection charge” every month. Fortunately, this died in committee and didn’t rise to the occasion of a Legislative vote. In Florida it is now a Republican sponsoring this bill SB1024 to try and do the same thing, basically protect the rote IOU electric utilities to embolden their “regulated monopoly” status in corporate America. Just like the FP&L and Duke backed Amendment 1 of 2016, which Floridians rejected by vote, the Legislature “should ” have caught on, this is NOT what the people want. I would expect the same move in California sooner or later, to rear its ugly head once again.

    ““This is a tired tactic that utilities have used to maintain their monopoly grip on electricity markets. Net metering is a popular program that gives people the right to choose the energy that works for them, provides benefits to all ratepayers and creates thousands of energy jobs across Florida.””

    This argument that net metering is “unfair” is the willingly ignorant agenda of the IOU electric utilities across the U.S.. You get to hear plenty about residential solar PV adopters ‘not’ paying their fair share of operations and maintenance costs and yet NOT A WORD about the utility enjoying distributed energy generation that is synchronized to the grid at the right frequency and voltage to use locally saving electricity loss inefficiencies along the grid. This ‘avoided cost’ is not even in the narrative when the utility cries foul about net metering. The utility doesn’t have to buy property, float loans or bonds, get a right of way, purchase, install, maintain or insure the residential solar PV system and yet take no consideration as to the actual “value” of local distributed energy.

    Reply

Tell Us What You Think! Cancel reply

Related Articles Read More >

$1.4 billion in solar, EV, storage developments cancelled in May
SMUD signs PPA for 640-MWh battery still under construction in Sacramento County
ENGIE includes solar panel recycling upfront in PPA for first time
SolarEdge batteries now qualify for Pacific Power’s Wattsmart Battery Program
Solar Power World Digital Edition
Check in with the nation's leading solar construction magazine today.
 
“the-informed-solar-installer”
“solar
“spw
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, tools and strategies for Solar Power Professionals.

Contractor’s Corner Podcast

“solar
Solar Power World
  • Top Solar Contractors
  • Solar Articles
  • Windpower Engineering & Development
  • Leadership
  • About/Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertising
  • WTWH Media

Copyright © 2025 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Solar Power World

  • Home
  • Top Solar Contractors
  • Articles
    • Most Recent Posts
    • News
      • Latest News Items
      • SPW State News Hub
      • IRA coverage
      • Solar tariffs
      • U.S. manufacturing updates
    • Featured
      • Latest Feature Stories
      • Contractor’s Corner
      • Trends in Solar
      • The Solar Explorer
  • Policy
    • The Solar Policy Scoop
    • IRA Coverage
  • Markets
    • Residential
    • Commercial
    • Community Solar
    • Utility
  • Products
    • Winners of SPW’s 2024 Top Products
    • Batteries and Storage
    • Electric Vehicle (EV)
    • Inverters
      • U.S. solar inverter manufacturers
    • Racking and Mounting
      • U.S. solar mounting manufacturers
    • Software
    • Solar Panels
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
  • Resources
    • About SPW
    • Digital Issues
    • Event Coverage
    • Podcasts
    • Product Manufacturing Locations
      • U.S. solar inverter manufacturers
      • U.S. solar mounting manufacturers
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
    • Solar Classrooms
    • Suppliers
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers
    • Voices
  • 2025 Leadership
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe