Solar Power World

  • Home
  • Top Solar Contractors
    • 10th Anniversary Roundtables
  • Articles
    • Most Recent Posts
    • News
      • Latest News Items
      • Solar tariffs
    • Featured
      • Latest Feature Stories
      • Contractors Corner
      • Trends in Solar
      • The Solar Explorer
  • Policy
    • Monthly Snapshots
  • Markets
    • Residential
    • Commercial
    • Community Solar
    • Utility
  • Products
    • 2020 Top Products
    • Batteries and Storage
    • Inverters
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
    • Racking and Mounting
    • Software
    • Solar Panels
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • About SPW
    • Digital Issues
    • Event Coverage
    • Leadership
      • 2020 Winners
      • 2019 Winners
      • 2018 Winners
    • Podcasts
    • Product Databases
      • Solar Inverter Models
      • Solar Panel Models
      • Solar Racking Models
      • Battery Storage Models
    • Product Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Inverter Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Solar Panel Manufacturing Locations
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
    • Solar Classrooms
      • Inverters
      • Solar panels
      • Roof-mount systems
      • Ground-mount systems
      • Residential energy storage systems
    • Suppliers
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers

How to maximize value with east-west clipping losses

By Paul Grana | November 17, 2017

Share

Cheaper modules are (probably) here to stay, and so is the increased use of east-west racking—also known as dual-tilt. At the same time, system engineers are also pushing the limits of their inverters, making sure that they squeeze every last dollar of value from the system. Combined, this raises a question: do these two trends help or hurt each other?

The east-west value proposition

At a high level, east-west racking enables more modules to fit into a roof area, typically an increase in capacity of 20-30%. At the same time, because the modules are not oriented toward the equator, the energy yield per installed watt of capacity drops by 5-10%.

Yet it isn’t just a question of how much less energy these new design approaches yield, but when the differences occur. Specifically, east-west arrays produce less energy in the middle of the day, when the sunlight is greatest.

Figure 1: Energy generated by hour of day, south-facing vs. east-west array

Because the east-west array is not pointed toward the equator, it does not produce as much at the peak production times. As a result, the energy production is more evenly weighted across hours of the day. This can also be seen if we chart how often the array is producing at various power levels (as a percentage of maximum STC rated power)—the east-west array spends significantly less time at significant power levels.

Figure 2: Frequency histogram: number of hours spent at power level

While the east-west array produces 8% less energy overall, it actually produces 75% less energy at the highest energy levels.

Because these high-power times are also when inverter clipping occurs, this means that the clipping losses from east-west arrays will be lower than south-facing arrays. As can be seen in the chart below, a DC/AC value of 1.35 results in just 0.5% over-power clipping losses with east-west, versus 1.5% for a south-facing array.

Figure 3: Clipping losses for east-west vs. south-facing array

Economic value

So, east-west racking can reduce clipping losses (and therefore improve production) by over 1%. There are two ways to think about this benefit.

First, with the same inverter budget, a system designer could simply enjoy reduced clipping losses, on the order of a 1% improvement as shown above. This helps to offset the 5-10% lower irradiance that east-west arrays get.

Figure 4: Clipping loss reduction for east-west array

Alternatively, a designer can target similar clipping losses, and use the east-west production profile to design for a smaller inverter. In the example used in this article, the inverter size could be reduced by 10%, saving $0.01-$0.02/watt in CAPEX cost.

Figure 5: Inverter size reduction for east-west array

In either case, system designers can leverage this knowledge to help reduce the LCOE of east-west racking arrays.

About The Author

Paul Grana

Paul Grana is the co-founder of Folsom Labs, where he leads sales and marketing, where he has helped to grow the company to thousands of installers in over 70 countries. He also founded the S3 Solar Software Summit, which brings together the industry’s leading software vendors and buyers each year. He previously worked at Abound Solar, and led product management and technical marketing with Tigo Energy. Paul holds a BS in Mathematics and Economics from the University of Chicago, and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

Comments

  1. Gary Fooks says

    October 2, 2020 at 2:57 am

    This piece of research is still valuable years later – so thank you.

    I was drawn to the EW concept not for any of the reasons above but as a way to reduce soiling losses: a 10 degree slope and rain will help reduce dust. I have no data to back up my hypothesis but Its worthy of consideration should someone wish to take up the research.

    Reply
  2. Fernando Pumarejo-Sproesser says

    November 22, 2017 at 11:52 pm

    Great explanation. We are going to install a SE and NW facing system (two different mppt trackers of course). At least in our neck of the woods the difference between SW and NW wasn’t as big as I thought it would be.

    Reply
  3. Ian Noorman says

    November 22, 2017 at 7:20 pm

    What was the actual kva output difference between the two systems
    Ie, 10 kw inverter with 13Kw array vs E6.5Kw & W6.5Kw arrays over a day and over a year

    Look forward to your thoughts

    By the way good read

    Reply

Tell Us What You Think! Cancel reply

Related Articles Read More >

Software services company CleanSpark acquires California installer Solar Watt Solutions
Duke Energy Renewables breaks ground on 50-MW North Carolina solar project
CenterPoint Energy seeks approval for 400 MW of solar power for Indiana utility customers
Experts recommend automatic enrollment in community solar programs for LMI groups

Exclusive SPW Content

Videos Podcasts Webinars Whitepapers

SPW Digital Editions

Solar Power World Digital EditionBrowse the current issue and archived issues of Solar Power World in an easy-to-use, high-quality format. Bookmark, share and interact with the leading solar construction magazine today.

Solar Policy Snapshot

Solar policy differs across state lines and regions. Click to see our monthly roundup of recent legislation and research throughout the country.

Read More >

Popular Posts See More >

Solar investment tax credit extended at 26% for two additional years
SolarJuice American to take over consumer contracts of bankrupt residential solar installer Petersen-Dean
What the Biden administration could mean for solar and storage
The changing state of retiring solar panels
Solar Power World
  • Top Solar Contractors
  • Solar Articles
  • Top Products
  • Leadership
  • WTWH Media
  • About/Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • Windpower Engineering & Development

Copyright © 2021 WTWH Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Site Map | Privacy Policy | RSS

Search Solar Power World

  • Home
  • Top Solar Contractors
    • 10th Anniversary Roundtables
  • Articles
    • Most Recent Posts
    • News
      • Latest News Items
      • Solar tariffs
    • Featured
      • Latest Feature Stories
      • Contractors Corner
      • Trends in Solar
      • The Solar Explorer
  • Policy
    • Monthly Snapshots
  • Markets
    • Residential
    • Commercial
    • Community Solar
    • Utility
  • Products
    • 2020 Top Products
    • Batteries and Storage
    • Inverters
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
    • Racking and Mounting
    • Software
    • Solar Panels
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
      • Global Manufacturing Locations
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • About SPW
    • Digital Issues
    • Event Coverage
    • Leadership
      • 2020 Winners
      • 2019 Winners
      • 2018 Winners
    • Podcasts
    • Product Databases
      • Solar Inverter Models
      • Solar Panel Models
      • Solar Racking Models
      • Battery Storage Models
    • Product Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Inverter Manufacturing Locations
      • Global Solar Panel Manufacturing Locations
      • U.S. solar panel manufacturers
    • Solar Classrooms
      • Inverters
      • Solar panels
      • Roof-mount systems
      • Ground-mount systems
      • Residential energy storage systems
    • Suppliers
    • Videos
    • Webinars / Digital Events
    • Whitepapers