Bingaman Proposes Clean Energy Standard Act Of 2012 (Including Solar)

Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Chairman Jeff Bingaman (NM) introduced legislation on March 1 to modernize the United States’ power sector and guide it toward a future in which more electricity is generated with cleaner energy.

The Clean Energy Standard Act of 2012, or CES for short, employs a straightforward, market-based approach that encourages a wide variety of electricity-generating technologies.  It sets a national goal for clean energy and establishes a transparent framework that lets resources compete based on how clean they are, then gets out of the way and lets the market and American ingenuity determine the best paths forward.

Bingaman said that the CES seeks to make sure that “as we continues to grow and power our economy, we leverage the clean resources we have available today, and also provide a continuing incentive to develop the cheaper, cleaner technologies that we’ll need in the future.  We want to make sure that we drive continued diversity in our energy sources, and allow every region to deploy clean energy using its own resources.  And we want to make sure that we do all of this in a way that supports home-grown innovation and manufacturing and keeps us competitive in the global clean energy economy.”

Bingaman’s design for the CES draws on extensive Energy Information Administration (EIA) modeling done at his request last year, and EIA’s results showed that a properly designed CES would have almost zero impact on GDP growth, and little to no impact on national electricity rates for the first decade of the program.

Under the plan, all generators of clean energy are given credits based upon their carbon emissions. Greater numbers of credits are given to generators with lower emissions per unit of electricity.  This flexible framework naturally allows a wide variety of sources (solar, wind, nuclear, natural gas, coal with carbon capture and storage, etc.) to be used to meet the standard, allows market forces to determine what the optimal mix of technologies and fuels should be, and makes it easy for new technologies to be incorporated.

To be considered “clean,” a generator must either be a zero-carbon source of energy, like renewables and nuclear power, or have a lower carbon intensity than a modern, efficient coal plant.  (Carbon intensity means the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per megawatt-hour of electricity generated.)  Accounting for “clean” this way means that the cleanest resources have the greatest incentive, and also that every generator has a continuing incentive  to become even more efficient.

In addition to driving cleaner electricity generation in the power sector, the CES also rewards industrial efficiency.  Combined heat and power units generate electricity while also capturing and using the heat for other purposes.  These units are treated as clean generators under the CES.  This will help deploy this kind of efficiency and provide another source of inexpensive clean energy.  All that the CES requires is that the generation we do use (and add to our fleet) gradually becomes cleaner over time.

“The goal of the CES is ambitious – a doubling of clean energy by 2035.  But analysis has shown that the goal is also achievable and affordable.  Meeting the CES will yield substantial benefits to our health, our economy, our global competitiveness and our economy,” Bingaman said.

Several of Bingaman’s colleagues are co-sponsoring the bill, including Sens. Wyden (OR), Sanders (VT), Mark Udall (CO), Franken (MN), Coons (DE), Kerry (MA), Whitehouse (RI) and Tom Udall (NM).

Join the conversation on Twitter via #CESBill.

Here is Senator Bingaman’s speech on the Senate floor introducing the bill:

Comments

  1. Jonathan says:

    When I grew up I was taught that plants need CO2 to survive. You know, we breath oxygen and exhale CO2, plants take in CO2 and emit oxygen. Cycle of life they called it.
    Were we taught wrong?
    If we are really loosing trees and greenery as fast as some claim, wouldn’t more CO2 would be a good thing?
    Seems strange to me that a government that mandated companies change all emissions to harmless CO2 in the late 20th century are now telling companies we are going to meter and credit (one of the best words for tax I’ve ever heard!) you on the CO2 we made you create. And we trust them!!
    I love solar power, but I smell a rat, a big fat money rat. Wonder what federally paid for projects New Mexico will get in Jeffs bill?

  2. Sirthreepio says:

    One of the consequences is that more US oil is exported. Everyone happy but Iran & Saudis.
    I can live with that. Saudis recently appeared to look into solar energy seriously (logical thinking). The happiest should be China, wouldn’t she ?